>> Calendar of Events

>> Academic Calendar

>> Contact Public Affairs

>> Media Contacts

>> Faculty Experts


>> Barnard Facts

NEWS ARCHIVE

Spring 2003 News
Fall 2002 News
Spring 2002 News
Fall 2001 News
• Spring 2001 News
Fall 2000 News
Spring 2000 News

>> Barnard Bulletin

>> WBAR: Barnard College Radio

>> Columbia Spectator


>> Columbia Record


Barnard Political Scientist Lori Minnite Co-Authors New Study on Voting Fraud

Barnard Political Scientist Lori Minnite has co-authored a new study that found voting fraud is a negligible problem in the United States, despite frequent allegations to the contrary. "Securing the Vote: An Analysis of Election Fraud," which was released by the non-partisan public policy and advocacy organization Demos, provides the first empirical evidence that reforms aimed at making voting easier – like computerized voting or election day registration – can broaden participation without risking increased fraud. In fact, the study finds that in many instances, such reforms make voter fraud much less likely.

"The report’s central findings make it clear that overstated allegations of election fraud should not be used to unnecessarily restrict access and make voting more difficult," says Minnite. "In fact, the report makes a compelling case that we can implement reforms that make regi stering and voting as accessible as possible to all Americans with great confidence in the outcome."

The report found little evidence that election reforms such as the National Voter Registration Act, election-day registration, and mail-in voting have resulted in increases in election fraud. Instead, the researchers found that the disenfranchisement of voters through antiquated voting systems, system error, and improper management of registration databases – as occurred in Florida in the 2000 election – is a far bigger problem than traditional forms of election fraud.

The report’s release coincides with state-level implementation of the 2002 federal election reform bill, the "Help America Vote Act" (HAVA). While election reform advocates hope that HAVA will be a major step forward, many are alarmed by HAVA’s new voter ID requirements – adopted to address the alleged threat of voter fraud – which could make it harder for Americans to vote.

"As states move forward in implementing the new election law, their mandate is to remove the barriers and inefficiencies that deny qualified voters their right to cast a ballot," says Steven Carbó, Director of the Democracy Program at Deomos. "Instead, some states are using HAVA to pursue onerous ID requirements that threaten to exclude voters, especially poor voters, voters of color, young people and new citizens."

"Too often, hearsay and anecdotal tales of voter fraud have stalled valuable election reforms that could help address one our nation’s most challenging issues – low voter participation," says Miles Rapoport, President of Deomos, and former Secretary of the State of Connecticut. "This report brings much-needed analysis to the debate and provides a framework to make informed decisions about election reform."
The full report, which includes a concise Q&A, extensive documentation, a stand alone executive summary and numerous policy recommendations, is available on the Deomos web site at www.demos-usa.org/pubs/securing.

 

©2002 Barnard College, 3009 Broadway, New York, NY 10027 | 212-854-5262 | Send Your Comments