|
POLITICAL
SCIENCE QUARTERLY SPECIAL ISSUE ANALYZES 9-11 IMPLICATIONS
FOR U.S. FOREIGN AND MILITARY POLICY
New
York, N.Y. (9-3-02) A year after Sept. 11, Americans
see themselves as more vulnerable than at any other time
in modern history, recognizing that while the U.S. military
can successfully hunt terrorists overseas, it cannot protect
civilians from surprise attacks at home, according to Barnard
College Professor Demetrios James Caraley, a national security
policy expert who analyzes the changed political landscape
in a special book published by the prestigious journal,
Political Science Quarterly.
"The greatest consequence of September 11 has been
to instill a sense of fear and vulnerability into a population
that had grown accustomed to ignoring routine issues of
safety and national security," writes Caraley, the
Janet Robb Professor of Social Sciences at Barnard who is
the author most recently of "The New American Interventionism"
(1999) He adds: "At a time when the United States enjoys
unrivalled military superiority throughout the world, the
U.S. population now sees itself as more vulnerable to injury
or death from an attack than at any other time in modern
history. Although the American military can still protect
iself very robustly, it cannot shield the American civilian
population from surprise terrorist attacks."
On the eve of the first anniversary of the attacks, Political
Science Quarterly, the journal of the Academy of Political
Science, which is edited by Caraley, published a special
book devoted to the implications of Sept. 11 for U.S. foreign
and military policy. A distinguished group of 11 scholars
from the academy and intelligence and defense communities
conclude that the United States remains vulnerable to large-scale
terrorism and must be willing to engage its military forces
on the ground to destroy terrorist cells while at the same
time move urgently to strengthen its intelligence abroad,
security at home and find ways to coopt or eradicate fundamentalist
movements in the Arab world.
Carley
will moderate a discussion among the authors, "September
11, Terrorist Attacks and U.S. Foreign Policy" on Sept.
11 from noon - 2:15 P.M. at the School of International
and Public Affairs, 420 West 118th Street at Amsterdam Avenue.
Barnard and Columbia students are invited. The book will
be available for purchase at the roundtable discussion.
Caraley
writes in a foreword that Americans, vulnerable in an open
society, must accept the fact that terrorists will develop
or steal biological, chemical and nuclear weapons or use
blockbuster truck bombs at home or against its allies. "Because
no shields exist to deploy against such weapons, about the
only card the United States has to play is to harden the
most lucrative targets and greatly strengthen intelligence
efforts with the help of allies," Caraley writes.
Caraley warns that the American military role against terrorism
cannot proceed on the assumption that casualties will be
limited. "If the United States is seen as only willing
to launch campaigns that it can win on the cheap as in Afghanistan,
the terrorists will be emboldened to try larger attacks
from sites that will be costly and difficult to track down,"
he warns.
Caraley also has misgivings about the conduct and direction
of the war on terror and the Bush administrations
strategies, both against terrorism and in the Middle East.
He notes that in toppling the weak Taliban regime, the United
States failed to capture or kill Osama bin Laden or other
high level al Qaeda leaders, leaving the terrorists to continue
to plot more terror. He also questions the administrations
strategy against Iraq. "By capturing of the front pages
and the talk shows with the subject of going to war against
Iraq, Bush simultaneously thinned out the energy and brain
power that could be devoted to the war against the terrorists
but also covered up that the war in Afghanistan had not
in fact be won, that al Qaeda and Taliban forces continued
to ambush and attack small groups of American special forces,
that American forces protect the president after a vice-president
was assassinated in Kabul. Furthermore, Saddam Hussein lives
and will continue to be found in Baghdad whereas bin Ladin
and his al Qaeda could be dispersed all over the world.
In addition to Professor Caraley, who is also a faculty
member at Columbia University, and Professor Alexander A.
Cooley, also of Barnard College, contributors to the Quarterlys
post-Sept. 11 books include Professors Richard K. Betts
and Robert Jervis of Columbia; Professor Walter LaFeber
of Cornell; Professors Victor D. Cha and Daniel Brumberg
of Georgetown; Professor Michael Doran of Princeton; Professor
Ruth Wedgwood of Yale; Richard I. Russell of the National
Defense University and Daniel Byman of the RAND Center for
Middle East Public Policy. The Quarterly is the most
widely read scholarly journal on government, politics, and
policy for both specialists and general readers.
More information about the book is available on the Academys
website: http://www.psqonline.org
Other key points include:
- The
United States must take all constitutional measures to
reduce the probability of further attacks while Americans
must realize that despite what the government does, more
people likely will become victims.
- The
pressing issue for the West is to find new means to either
coopt or eradicate fundamentalist movements, especially
in countries of immense geostrategic importance such as
Egypt, Pakistan, and most important of all, Saudi Arabia.
- While
fundamentalist movements are reactions against the West
and particularly, U.S. policy, they are separately nourished
by some states and state policies among Americas
Arab allies, who try to divert social and economic dissatisfaction
among their people toward a religious war of Islam against
the West.
- While
there is no systematic link between terrorism and poverty,
the link between economic deprivation and the growth of
fundamentalist movements is strong in Arab counties, where
these groups provide services and functions that the state
can no longer afford
- The
United States cannot act unilaterally to combat terrorism
and must cooperate and share intelligence with international
counterparts.
- The
attacks, by renewing centralization of power in the federal
government, have reversed the trend since the Reagan administration
to move resources and responsibilities away from the federal
government and toward the states.
- New
legislation to conduct surveillance and detain immigrants,
if not carefully done, poses a danger to our democratic
rights and liberties.
The
Academy of Political Science, based in New York, is a nonpartisan,
nonprofit organization founded in 1880 to contribute to
the scholarly examination of political institutions, processes
and public policies; to enrich political discourse and channel
the best social science research in an understandable way
to political leaders for use in public policy making and
the process of governing; and to educate members of the
general public so that they become informed voters in the
democratic process. Published continuously since 1886, Political
Science Quarterly, the Academys journal, is dedicated
to objective analysis based on evidence.
|