COMMENTARY
Students
"Reacting was completely unique
in my college experience. In playing those games, the words of Gandhi,
Socrates, and other historical figures became mine, transcending the
academic distance to which I had grown accustomed and tapping into a very
personal, intimate realm. Their thoughts, their histories, their biographies
are real and alive in my mind."
Amanda
Houle, Barnard '06, in "Reacting to 'Reacting'" (Change magazine)
"Even though it was so hard and took a lot of time and effort, it was amazing."
Ali Yehia
Zakaria, American University in Cairo '10
"I've learned a lot more here than I've learned in history classes in the past."
Catherine
Hay, University of Georgia '09
"History isn't just about dates and historical events, but most importantly, about the people, the ideas, the explorations, the quandaries, the downfalls and tragedies [all of which I am now] able to relate to the present. . . and isn't that what history is all about?"
Dayna
Hardtman, Smith College '06
"You're not just reading the Republic and these other great works. You're living them."
Rachel Feinmark, Columbia College '05
"This allows you to really take part in history. It's not you sitting there listening to your professor babble on. You actually get to do something . . ."
Samuel Zivin, Trinity
College '07
"After taking Reacting, I felt like I really understood why history happened the way it did, and the ways it could have turned out differently."
Ruth Crossman, Barnard College '06
Faculty and Administrators
"I have found teaching a 'Reacting' Seminar to
be one of the best educational things I have
done in the past 25 years. I have never seen
first-year students so engaged in discussion,
research, and intellectual conversation as I
have in the seminar this fall. Keeping up with
their strategies and plans, as they seek to
accomplish their 'victory objectives' has me deeply engaged as well. It's been a great experience for all of us."
Frank G. Kirkpatrick, Ellsworth Morton Tracey
Lecturer and Professor of Religion, Trinity College
"'Reacting to the Past' has made a major
impression on campus life. Students are debating the issues of
Athenian democracy or Confucian propriety over
dinner and in their dorms.
Shy students speak, and assertive
students lead.
Classes never end on time, more papers
are written than are assigned, and the quality
of the work is among the best I have ever seen.
J.
Patrick Coby,
Professor of Government, Smith College
"I'm not sure that
I've ever had a classroom full of first-year
non-majors chuckling about a reference to the
Iliad."
Nicolas Proctor, Associate Professor of
History, Simpson College
"I have never seen students this engaged. They write more than the assignments require; everyone, shy or not, participates vigorously in the debates. They read important texts with real understanding, making complex arguments and ideas their own."
Larry Carver, Doyle Professor of Western
Civilization and Director of the Liberal Arts
Honors
Programs,
University of Texas at Austin,
Chronicle Review (Nov. 12, 2004)
"I was
immediately impressed by the level of excitement
and engagement manifested by the students, and
with the fact that they really were running
things themselves rather than being spoon-fed by
an instructor. . . The students clearly inhabit
their roles quite intensely and strongly desire
to 'win' the game. This has a positive effect of
getting them
deeply involved in the course--I saw
examples of out-of-class lobbying in the cafι,
and caucusing among the factions was hot and
heavy. . . The students were certainly
confronted with the issue of reading ideas in
their context, and with confronting the
relationship between philosophical thought and
actual deeds--which tends to be downplayed in the
traditional ["great books" discussion format]. .
. I retain quite vivid images of the passion and seriousness with which the students confronted the issues presented to them by the game situation. My sense is that they are getting a lot out of it on various levels: learning to form arguments, to think on their feet, to consider carefully the arguments of those on the other side of a debate, to consider the relationship between formal social rules and the ends that individuals and groups seek to gain. And they are also reading and thinking about some central texts of the western canon. I ended up being really a fan of the game-playing concept. . . and of making it accessible to other colleges and universities."
Josiah Ober, Constantine Mitsotakis Chair and Professor of Political Science and Classics, School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford University
"One of the amazing things about 'Reacting' is
that the students never miss a class unless they
absolutely have to.
But it's a bit humbling to discover that
it's not necessarily the instructor who's the
major draw--clearly, a large part of what brings
the students back day after day is the palpable
excitement of being in the 'Reacting' classroom.
. . I'm always amazed by the students'
willingness to put extra time into this course.
And what amazes me even more is that there
really isn't a big stick that's making them do
this--it's all the carrot, as it were, that
comes from making the game go well."
Herb
Sloan, Professor of History, Barnard College
"I was impressed with our first experience
teaching the Reacting "French Revolution" game.
Students engaged with primary texts and worked
harder on writing and persuasion than in 'normal'
classes. The game provided a context for them to articulate some of the main philosophical debates about the concept of democracy. My students overwhelmingly indicated that they would recommend a course taught by the Reacting method to other students."
John M. Burney, Associate Provost for Curriculum, Faculty Development and Assessment, Drake University
"As
they assume adult roles in wrenching human
dramas, Reacting students cease being students. By persevering when the cause is hopeless, by hurdling personal and intellectual obstacles, they acquire stature--sometimes noble, sometimes heroic, and nearly always fascinating."
Mark C. Carnes, Ann Whitney Olin Professor of
History, Barnard College
Independent Observers
". . . a new and rapidly growing paedagogical movement called 'Reacting to the Past' is reinventing the Trivium for the 21st century."
Niall W. Slater, Dobbs Professor of Greek and Latin, President,
Phi Beta Kappa, in LiberalArtsOnline
"I came to
this revisionist enterprise with a degree of skepticism, but attended the
third "game" of the semester, the India Game, which is devoted to an
extended version of the Simla conference that the British established in
1945 to determine the shape of India's future. . . The first and perhaps
most important thing to say is that students are highly engaged all the
time--aroused, amused, talkative. In a word, they are happy. In "Reacting to
the Past," no student can withdraw from the class, even if she wanted to do
so. The structure of the course forces them all to stay active. The students
talk to one another outside of class; they meet in groups for strategy
meetings, sometimes staying up as late as 4 a.m. to do so. They communicate
by e-mail. Leaders emerge who cajole and shame the lazier students into
performing. . . I think this is a brilliant and
well-developed pedagogical experiment which has met with obvious success:
The games produce engagement and ardor in the students and also a dangerous
but exciting wrenching of belief in which the students learn the power
of subjectivity. I see the course as an excellent alternative to the
traditional version of Contemporary Civilization [Columbia College's 'great
books' discussion class.]
[Some students] might not be attracted to "Reacting to the Past," but those who are attracted will flourish and likely have the most exciting experience of their undergraduate careers."
Evaluation of "Reacting to the Past" submitted to the U.S. Department of
Education by David Denby, author of
Great Books: My Adventures with
Homer, Rousseau, Woolf, and
Other Indestructible
Writers of the Western World
and staff writer for the New Yorker
Printer-friendly version